The movie Changing Lanes is a great movie related to these legal issues. What do you think the law is at certain level?

 

A woman sat in the back of the cold, outdated courtroom. She appeared to have no purpose. I was there seeking a restraining order against my neighbor Tiffany Berg in Brookigns, Oregon for two years of conduct that I consider harassment, culminating in what I perceived as a threat involving a firearm.

 

Over two years, several incidents occurred that caused me concern. On one occasion, while I was driving on Highway 101, my neighbor passed multiple vehicles on Highway 101 to pull up behind me to videotape me. I filed a police report, but the police did nothing. On another occasion, while I was walking into Cascade Home Center, my neighbor drove into the parking lot in her large white SUV and made gestures at me. I believed she might strike me with her vehicle as she zoomed away without stopping to enter the store. So why was she there? Again, I filed a police report, and again the police did nothing.

 

On yet another occasion, my neighbor flew a drone near my head while I was on my own property. I filed a police report and they did nothing. For the restraining order, I submitted a notarized affidavit from a former worker who stated that, while working on my property, without interacting with my neighbor she yelled, “I fear for my life and I am armed.” She then repeated the statement to me without being provoked. Therefore, because my neighbor has made many false statements about me, I believe she might shoot me. I was behind a 6-foot fence and not armed. Was I going to jump over a 6-foot fence?

 

So, I filed for a restraining order, which the police recommended. However, despite presenting evidence, my request was denied. After the ruling, I left, asking the middle-age brunette woman bearing eyeglasses sitting in the back of the courtroom whether she was there on my neighbor's behalf. She said no.

​

Previously, I hired a local worker. Although he frequently failed to appear as scheduled, I continued working with him. Early on, he told me he did not have a driver's license but was in the process of obtaining one, which I needed for my 1031.After months without receiving the documentation, I filed a small claims action. Before the hearing, I tried to dismiss the case but was denied.

 

At the small claims hearing, my neighbor attended with her husband, which was confusing because neither testified, and neither had knowledge of my business relationship. They simply sat in the back of the courtroom. But why, to influence the same judge, Jesse C. Margolis, who denied my protective order - just by sitting in back of the court they influenced tthis judge by their mere presence?

 

These experiences reminded me of an earlier experience. I remember wondering, who was sitting in back of the court room that the judge kept looking at. When my son was 14, I sought reasonable child support, more than the $250 a month I received for 14 years. This amount was determined while my son's father's ex-wife worked for Child Support Services, one of 3 attorneys.

 

Years later, I discovered that my son's father owned an apartment complex and that the property manager submitted net income rather than gross as the law required, which is why I received so little. Therefore, I filed suit. During my hearing, I noticed a couple sitting in the back of the courtroom. Throughout the proceeding, the judge kept looking at them. Who were they?

 

Pay attention to who is sitting in back of the court room.

 

Regarding my son’s apartment, the trustee, attorney filed that my son’s father is the trustee of the trust after my son's father died. But how can a dead man be a trustee? This is fraud.

 

For me, when I moved my Mesa home out of an irrevocable trust during Covid since I thought I might get fired since I wasn't going to take the jab, the #SantaBarbaraTaxAccessor didn’t hesitate to strip me of my Proposition 13 rights – and didn’t tell me about it for 2 years where then I couldn’t do anything about the reassessment that caused my yearly property tax to go from $8,000 to $18,000

 

I filed a criminal complaint with the Santa Barbara DA because filing that a dead man is a trustee is fraud. It also puts my son at risk because by not identifying himself for an apartment that is falling apart as the property manager and him suck the money out of the apartment that is earning almost $20,000 monthly; an apartment 1/2 block from the entrance of the University of California, my son could be at risk for potential accidents, etc.

 

The motive for deeming a dead man a trustee is that - generally when one dies or a transfer from an irrevocable trust occurs as in my case, proper paperwork with the tax accessor is required such as the parent/child exemption form and a copy of the trust - the alleged trustee can hide the self-serving trust he drafted, instead of one that designates my son, my son's father's only child, as beneficiary of his father's asset as his father intended. In my opinion, the Woodland Hills attorney Eric Babian, the alleged trustee, took advantage of an old man with caner during Covid. 

 

What for my PodCast about this. I interviewed the tenants of the apartment and took pictures of the apartment building.

 

​